Skip to main content

Seismic Neglect: Buildings and Earthquakes

Published on May 21, 2016

A vehicle heavily damaged during the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake
Seattle, WA, March 4, 2001 -- A large van was crushed by earthquake debris in a Seattle parking lot. FEMA News Photo by Kevin Galvin Image Credit: Kevin Galvin, FEMA News Photo Library

Seismic Neglect | In the first part of a continuing series, The Seattle Times examined officials’ neglect of the most vulnerable kind of building: old, brick structures called unreinforced masonry. Here are answers to some common questions about those buildings.

The Northwest is threatened by earthquakes far more destructive than anything Washington state has experienced in modern times, a danger lawmakers have largely disregarded. In the first part of a continuing series, The Seattle Times examined officials’ neglect of the most vulnerable kind of building: old, brick structures called unreinforced masonry.

Here are answers to some common questions about unreinforced-masonry buildings.

How do I know if my building is unreinforced masonry?

If you live in Seattle, search our map of unreinforced-masonry buildings identified by the city.

It’s not always possible to tell just by looking. Sometimes brick walls have been plastered over, and sometimes what appears to be solid brick is actually veneer. There’s a good chance a building is unreinforced if it was built during the 1940s or earlier. Another telltale sign: bricks that look shorter than others, about every sixth row, that are actually turned on end.

Some California cities require warning signs on unretrofitted, unreinforced-masonry buildings, but there’s no such requirement in the Northwest.

Continue reading at The Seattle Times.

(Originally written by Sandi Doughton & Daniel Gilbert of The Seattle Times.)


Search by categories

Twitter Feed