Skip to main content

Fast food, supermarkets, other aspects of built environments don’t play expected role in weight gain

Published on June 4, 2021

Image of the "snack" shelf at the first Amazon Go store in Downtown Seattle.
The first Amazon Go store, Downtown Seattle Image Credit: GoToVan CCA 2.0

People don’t gain or lose weight because they live near a fast-food restaurant or supermarket, according to a new study led by the University of Washington. And, living in a more “walkable”, dense neighborhood likely only has a small impact on weight.

These “built-environment” amenities have been seen in past research as essential contributors to losing weight or tending toward obesity. The idea appears obvious: If you live next to a fast-food restaurant, you’ll eat there more and thus gain weight. Or, if you have a supermarket nearby, you’ll shop there, eat healthier and thus lose weight. Live in a neighborhood that makes walking and biking easier and you’ll get out, exercise more and burn more calories.

The new study based on anonymized medical records from more than 100,000 Kaiser Permanente Washington patients did not find that living near supermarkets or fast-food restaurant had any impact on weight. However, urban density, such as the number of houses in a given neighborhood, which is closely linked to neighborhood “walkability” appears to be the strongest element of the built environment linked to change in body weight over time.

“There’s a lot of prior work that has suggested that living close to a supermarket might lead to lower weight gain or more weight loss, while living close to lots of fast-food restaurants might lead to weight gain,” said James Buszkiewicz, lead author of the study and a research scientist in the UW School of Public Health. “Our analyses of the food environment and density together suggests that the more people there are in an area — higher density — the more supermarkets and fast-food restaurants are located there. And we found that density matters to weight gain, but not proximity to fast food or supermarkets. So, that seems to suggest that those other studies were likely observing a false signal.”

The UW-led study, published earlier this month in the International Journal of Obesity, found that people living in neighborhoods with higher residential and population density weigh less and have less obesity than people living in less-populated areas. And that didn’t change over a five-year period of study.

“On the whole, when thinking about ways to curb the obesity epidemic, our study suggests there’s likely no simple fix from the built environment, like putting in a playground or supermarket,” said Buszkiewicz, who did his research for the study while a graduate student in the UW Department of Epidemiology.

Rather than “something magical about the built environment itself” influencing the weight of those individuals, Buszkiewicz said, community-level differences in obesity are more likely driven by systematic factors other than the built environment — such as income inequality, which is often the determining factor of where people can afford to live and whether they can afford to move.

“Whether you can afford to eat a healthy diet or to have the time to exercise, those factors probably outweigh the things we’re seeing in terms of the built environment effect,” he said.

Co-authors include Jennifer Bobb, Andrea Cook, Maricela Cruz, Paula Lozano, Dori Rosenberg, Mary Kay Theis and Jane Anau at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute; Anne Vernez Moudon, UW Urban Form Lab, College of Built EnvironmentsStephen Mooney, UW Department of EpidemiologyPhilip Hurvitz, UW Urban Form Lab and Center for Studies in Demography and EcologyShilpi Gupta and Adam Drewnowski, UW Center for Public Health Nutrition and Department of Epidemiology.

Continue reading at UW News.

Originally written by  for UW News.
Search by categories

Twitter Feed